{"id":1742,"date":"2026-07-06T11:36:08","date_gmt":"2026-07-06T11:36:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/?p=1742"},"modified":"2026-07-06T17:32:23","modified_gmt":"2026-07-06T17:32:23","slug":"version-6-launched-new-visualization-methods-new-filters-new-interface","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/version-6-launched-new-visualization-methods-new-filters-new-interface\/","title":{"rendered":"Version 6 Launched: New Visualization Methods, New Filters, New Interface"},"content":{"rendered":"

Alright, this is big. I\u2019m proud to announce the most extensive upgrade<\/strong> in the visualization capabilities and the user interface & experience of this project since 2018.<\/p>\n

I was able to develop many features I\u2019ve been dreaming to implement for years in a few weeks thanks to AI-assisted programming. (None of these features was suggested by AI \u2013 I’m relatively tech-resistant and I only use AI to get technical help, mostly in programming. I never use it to generate ideas, text, or data.) I won\u2019t list all of the novelties here in order to be able to publish this post in a reasonable timeframe, but here are the most important ones.<\/p>\n

Three Main Views<\/h2>\n

We now have three different visualization methods to explore my research: in addition to the old Sentences Timeline<\/b>, you can now easily switch to the People Graph<\/b>, and the People Timeline,<\/b> using the toggle at the top right.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The People Graph<\/b> is a force-directed graph with philosophers (instead of sentences) as nodes. It\u2019s a new, more advanced version of the one I first created using Kumu last year. You can read about some design decisions here<\/a> on my old post.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The People Timeline<\/b> is a surprisingly insightful version of the force-directed graph, which locks people\u2019s horizontal positions on a timeline<\/strong>, to add a chronological dimension. (I used \u201cbirth year + 35\u201d for the horizontal positions, as an approximation of the beginning of the philosophers\u2019 \u201cactive years\u201d \u2013 of course there are many exceptions, but it\u2019s good enough for the purposes of this visualization, as a first step. And I designed a time scale change after 1800 to better visualize the density in recent centuries.)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

These new People views also allow you to easily focus on a philosopher and their connections<\/strong> with one click.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

New Filter System<\/h2>\n

These three methods look exciting, but the real fun starts when you start to apply the new filters: I took special care to make the new filtering system work with branch-specific connection weights (in people views), multiple selections, and smooth transitions across the three main views<\/strong>. So now you can see how (1) contemporary<\/em> philosophers (added in my research so far) who write on (2) logic<\/em> (3) disagree<\/em> with each other in a timeline, then go see their sentences by switching to the Sentences Timeline, etc.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Or see the relationships in (1) contemporary<\/em> philosophy of (2) mind<\/em> on a timeline:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Or see the\u00a0(1) ancient <\/em>philosophers who write on (2) ethics<\/em>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Or see the\u00a0(1) agreement<\/em> connections of (2) Marx<\/em> in (3) political<\/em> philosophy with (4) contemporary<\/em> philosophers:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The option to filter connections by branches recalculates the connection weights<\/strong> according to that branch; when you click Ethics, <\/em>only connections between ethics sentences are visualized. This can reveal meaningful clusters in People Graph; for example, Political <\/i>+ Ethics <\/i>+ Contemporary <\/i>filtering shows two groups corresponding to analytical and continental traditions (even when there’s no such explicit categorization in my research), with people like Rorty and Habermas in between.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Basics filter<\/strong><\/a> I had previously implemented works on the new version too: If you\u2019re new to philosophy, you can use it to see few select prominent ideas for each philosopher as an introduction.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

You can also add other filters to get overviews such as the basics<\/em> of political<\/em> philosophy in the Modern<\/em> period.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Color-Coding for Branches<\/h2>\n

With all these nice branch filters on the bottom left, I also added a color-coding to the sentence dots: they take their colors according to the branches they belong to<\/strong>, constructed like a pie chart if they have more than one branch.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

But don\u2019t be overwhelmed by this feature! You don\u2019t need to distinguish all these colors<\/strong> and remember their meanings in order to benefit from it \u2013 it already is informative without looking at the legend, because it lets you see how diverse a philosopher\u2019s output is<\/strong>, or which philosophers work in similar or different branches <\/strong>at a glance. (And in my experience, once you spend some time and get used to the colors, it can really allow you to read the branches.) The same color-coding is also present in people views, as flags around the philosopher nodes<\/strong>, with unchanging branch-specific angles to make it more readable.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Tags and Names Panel<\/h2>\n

I added a panel where you can filter the visualizations according to the tags, or people<\/strong>. With multiple selections, these can be very useful to see the content around a topic, or the relationships between a specific set of people. Examples:<\/p>\n

Social contract<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Atheism + pantheism + theism<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Stoicism<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Pragmatism + neopragmatism<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Problem of evil + theodicy<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Existentialism<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Post-structuralism, postmodernism, social constructionism, structuralism<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Names filter: Husserl, Heidegger, Sartre<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Search Term Filtering<\/h2>\n

I also added a filtering function to the main search bar: Now, in addition to using the search bar to jump to sentences\/people, you can filter the visualization with a search term<\/strong>, e.g. seeing all sentences that contain \u201cfree will\u201d in their text or their tags<\/strong>:<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Or search for \u201ctheory of truth\u201d to see sentences belonging to various theories of truth favoring correspondence, coherence, performance, identity, deflation, etc. because their tags include \u201ctheory of truth\u201d.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

I deliberately didn\u2019t choose a whole-word method here<\/strong>, in order to allow searches like \u201cfemini\u201d to fetch content that includes \u201cfeminism\u201d, \u201cfeminist\u201d, \u201cfeminine\u201d, etc.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

And you can always add other filters to these search filterings: a search filter for \u201cmeaning\u201d will show different networks under a Language<\/em> filter and an Ethics<\/em> filter.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Other UI and UX improvements<\/h2>\n

I added a colorblind safe mode toggle<\/strong> for the red-green connection colors, making them red-blue.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"
\nfrom Adobe’s Color blindness simulator<\/a><\/h5>\n

 <\/p>\n

I added right-click (long tap on mobile) interactions to philosophers for info boxes and to sentences for reference boxes<\/strong>. (The book icons that appear on hover and show the reference are still there as well.)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

And I was able to increase the resolution of the whole visualization system<\/strong>, so it looks much sharper than before now.<\/p>\n

I also tried to make everything work on smartphones too, creating a special menu panel and touch gesture interactions for mobile, though I recommend using this complex system on big screens.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u2014<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

This was a lot of work, with many hard information\/software architecture decisions, meticulous visual design care, and hours of bug-solving. Hope you enjoy exploring it here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

A final caution note:<\/b> The editorial limitations which you can read about on the About<\/a> page apply in these visualizations. Since this is a personal passion project and the research and the editorial work is continuously done by me (without the use of AI), it\u2019s a never-ending work-in-progress; not everybody is here, and the connections\/branches\/tags of the included philosophers and sentences aren\u2019t exhaustive. You can see and subscribe to the updates here<\/a>.<\/p>\n

I thank my friends Emre Parlak and Korcan Aky\u0131ld\u0131z for their suggestions and support.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Alright, this is big. I\u2019m proud to announce the most extensive upgrade in the visualization capabilities and the user interface & experience of this project since 2018. I was able to develop many features I\u2019ve been dreaming to implement for years in a few weeks thanks to AI-assisted programming. (None of these features was suggested by AI \u2013 I’m relatively tech-resistant and I only use AI to get technical help, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5pEAz-s6","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1742"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1742"}],"version-history":[{"count":33,"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1742\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1819,"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1742\/revisions\/1819"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.denizcemonduygu.com\/philo\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}